Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm

The Real blockchain, a decentralized Layer 1 (L1) network, is dedicated to enabling small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to tokenize real-world assets (RWAs) securely and efficiently. As of May 18, 2025, Real operates using a Tendermint-based Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, leveraging the Cosmos SDK for fast finality and scalability. However, exploring alternative consensus algorithms like Hashgraph can provide insights into potential future enhancements for Real’s performance and security. This page describes the concept of the Hashgraph consensus algorithm, its key features, and how it could theoretically benefit a project like Real.


What is the Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm?

Hashgraph is a distributed ledger technology (DLT) consensus algorithm developed by Leemon Baird in 2016, designed to achieve fast, secure, and fair consensus in a decentralized network. Unlike traditional blockchain consensus mechanisms (e.g., Proof-of-Work or Tendermint PoS), Hashgraph uses a gossip-about-gossip protocol and virtual voting to reach agreement on transaction order and timestamps without the need for energy-intensive mining or leader-based block production.

How Does Hashgraph Work?

Hashgraph operates by building a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure, where nodes (computers in the network) share and record events (transactions and metadata) through a gossip protocol. Here’s a breakdown of its core mechanics:

  1. Gossip Protocol:

    • Nodes in the network communicate by gossiping—randomly sharing information (events) with other nodes.

    • Each event contains:

      • A timestamp.

      • One or more transactions (e.g., transferring $REAL tokens or tokenizing an RWA).

      • References (hashes) to previous events from the same node and the node it’s gossiping with.

      • A digital signature to ensure authenticity.

    • This gossip-about-gossip process ensures that all nodes quickly learn about all events, creating a shared history in the form of a DAG.

  2. Virtual Voting:

    • Instead of explicit voting, Hashgraph uses a virtual voting mechanism to determine consensus.

    • Each node can calculate the order of events based on the DAG’s structure, using two key concepts:

      • Famous Witnesses: Events that are widely seen by the network, determined by a voting-like process within the DAG.

      • Strongly Seeing: A node can “see” an event if there’s a clear path of events connecting them, ensuring a supermajority of nodes agree on the event’s position.

    • Nodes compute the consensus timestamp and order of transactions by analyzing the DAG, without needing to communicate votes directly.

  3. Consensus and Finality:

    • Hashgraph achieves asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT), meaning it can tolerate up to one-third of nodes being malicious or failing, even in an asynchronous network (where message delivery times are unpredictable).

    • Transactions are finalized with a consensus timestamp, ensuring fairness and preventing manipulation (e.g., front-running).

    • Once consensus is reached, the transaction order is immutable, providing strong finality.

Key Features of Hashgraph

  • High Speed: Hashgraph can process thousands of transactions per second (TPS) with low latency, as it avoids the bottlenecks of block production and mining.

  • Fairness: Transactions are ordered based on consensus timestamps, reducing the risk of miners or validators manipulating transaction order for profit.

  • Energy Efficiency: Unlike Proof-of-Work, Hashgraph doesn’t require computational mining, making it more environmentally friendly.

  • Scalability: The gossip protocol scales well with the number of nodes, as each node only needs to communicate with a few others to propagate information.

  • Security: Hashgraph’s aBFT ensures the network remains secure even if up to one-third of nodes are malicious or fail.

Hashgraph in the Context of Real

Current Consensus on Real

As of May 18, 2025, Real uses a Tendermint-based PoS consensus mechanism, which provides fast finality (transactions are confirmed in seconds) and high throughput, making it well-suited for RWA tokenization. Validators and delegators stake $REAL tokens to secure the network, earning rewards from transaction fees and inflation (currently 4% annually, per the Tokens Guide). However, exploring Hashgraph offers a theoretical perspective on how Real could evolve to further enhance its performance.

Potential Benefits of Hashgraph for Real

If Real were to adopt or integrate elements of the Hashgraph consensus algorithm, it could potentially offer the following advantages:

  • Faster Transaction Finality: Hashgraph’s gossip protocol and virtual voting could reduce latency even further, enabling near-instant confirmation for RWA tokenization and trading.

  • Improved Fairness: Hashgraph’s consensus timestamping could ensure a fairer ordering of transactions, which is critical for financial applications like RWA marketplaces where order manipulation (e.g., front-running) could harm users.

  • Higher Throughput: Hashgraph’s ability to handle thousands of TPS could support Real’s growth as more SMEs tokenize assets and the network sees increased transaction volume.

  • Energy Efficiency: While Tendermint PoS is already energy-efficient compared to Proof-of-Work, Hashgraph’s design could further reduce the network’s environmental footprint.

  • Enhanced Security: Hashgraph’s aBFT could provide stronger guarantees against malicious actors, ensuring the integrity of tokenized RWAs even in adversarial conditions.

Challenges of Adopting Hashgraph

  • Compatibility: Real’s current architecture is built on the Cosmos SDK, which is tightly integrated with Tendermint. Adopting Hashgraph would require significant changes to the protocol, potentially disrupting existing validators and smart contracts.

  • Governance and Transition: Switching consensus mechanisms would require community consensus through Real’s on-chain governance (see app.real.finance/governance), which could be a complex process.

  • Maturity: While Hashgraph is a proven technology (e.g., used by Hedera Hashgraph), its adoption in a Cosmos-based ecosystem like Real is less tested compared to Tendermint.

Use Case Example: RWA Tokenization with Hashgraph

Imagine an SME tokenizing a piece of real estate on Real using Hashgraph consensus:

  • The SME submits a tokenization transaction, which is gossiped across the network.

  • Nodes quickly propagate the event, and within milliseconds, the transaction is assigned a consensus timestamp and order using virtual voting.

  • The transaction is finalized with high fairness, ensuring no validator can manipulate the order to favor certain investors.

  • Investors can purchase fractional ownership of the tokenized real estate with confidence, knowing the process is secure, fast, and transparent.

Exploring Hashgraph on Real

While Real currently uses Tendermint, developers and researchers can experiment with Hashgraph-inspired mechanisms on the REAL Testnet or Localnet. For example:

  • Simulate Hashgraph: Build a custom module or smart contract that mimics Hashgraph’s gossip protocol and virtual voting for a subset of transactions.

  • Compare Performance: Test the speed, fairness, and scalability of Hashgraph-like consensus against Tendermint in a controlled environment.

  • Propose Upgrades: If the results are promising, propose integrating Hashgraph elements via Real’s governance system.


Need Help?

If you have questions about consensus mechanisms or want to explore Hashgraph for Real, reach out to our team:

The Hashgraph consensus algorithm offers a fascinating alternative for achieving fast, fair, and secure consensus, which could enhance Real’s mission of tokenizing RWAs. While Real currently thrives with Tendermint PoS, exploring innovative technologies like Hashgraph ensures we stay at the forefront of blockchain innovation. Join us in shaping the future of Real!

Last updated